Strategic Defense Group

Train, Equip, Defend

  • Course Offerings
    • S.T.I.M. – Strategic Threat Interdiction & Mitigation
    • CCDW: Concealed Carry of a Deadly Weapon
  • Church Safety
  • Security Consulting
  • The Sharpening Stone
  • Contact Us
  • Cart
  • Mission / About us

Pre-Attack Indicators

Posted by adam on July 12, 2016
Posted in: Carrying a deadly weapon, Defense Mentality, Hand to Hand, Intermediate Weapons, Mass Murder, No-Gun Defense, Self Defense, Training, Uncategorized. Tagged: attack, body language, pre-attack indicators, Preattack indicators, situational awareness, violence.

Is there any way to predict the imminent danger of an attack? Absolutely! Can this be done with 100% accuracy? Nope. However, we can gather data, add it together, and compute a likelihood and probability. We do this by looking at past events, their outcome, and comparing that with our current circumstances.

Each and every incident is unique, but more than that, they are ever evolving and changing as they unfold. We are going to look at some “pre-attack indicators”. So called for their purpose and function. We look at pre-attack indicators prior to an attack to help us calculate its outcome.

Here is an incomplete, but sizable list of pre-attack indicators:

  • Darting glances (looking escape or friends)
  • Target Glance (looking at weapons, or targets)
  • Face wipe
  • Grooming (adjusting hair, picking at nose ears, etc)
  • Removing clothes (seriously, taking off the shirt is common)
  • Cracking Knuckles (preparing the fists)
  • Pacing back and forth (unsettled and nervous)
  • Pointing fingers (admitting target)
  • Shouting and screaming
  • Threats (obvious)

The above list is not exhaustive, but it is a good start. When you find yourself in a sketchy situation, look for some or all of the above cues. They may or may not be present in any and all combinations. A calm, cool, and experienced head, is not likely to show signs of a fight, so this is not a guarantee, just a likelihood.

Once we have looked for pre-attack indicators we need to make an assessment. This is where we move from information to intelligence. Let us do a quick hypothetical: You and some guy are having words, never mind the reason. He is becoming hostile and you are getting nervous about the whole thing. You observe him pacing, screaming, pointing fingers, and looking around. You have someone call 911, but now what? What can you do while waiting for the cops?

First, create a reactionary gap. This allows us more room and time to react. Now that we have that, we begin to plan. What are we going to do if he does “this”? That is why we have so much time going through mental simulations, right? We are going through and over our capabilities. Legally, we cannot take preemptive action. Just because you observe a few pre-attack indicators does not mean you can shoot, stab, slash, or through punch the guy.

What we can do it assess the subject. We can identify weak points, vulnerabilities, ability and skill,  and tools.  Once the fight is on, if it ever comes, we can and will be much more prepared than the bad guy, and that is everything in a fight.

Pre-attack indicators are a fantastic tool and should be used regularly. One neat thing about this is you can do it anywhere, anytime. You can master this art in a relatively short time. Once you have, you will become fluid in reading people. You will be able to tell just by looking at someone if something is not right.

Take the time, and make the effort to learn and practice pre-attack indicators. They may just save your life. You will be less likely to be caught off guard and more likely to win, prevent, avoid, or run away from a fight.

What can we learn?

  • Pre-attack indicators are good, but not a guarantee.
  • We cannot attack based on indicators, we can, however, plan our attack.
  • Once we have seen indicators, we have to assess the threat and ourselves.
  • Get police in route anytime we can in such a situation.
  • Use reactionary gap, and mental simulations to help you win the fight if it comes to that.

Stay Sharp,

Adam

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posts navigation

← Practice makes permanent
Compound Danger of Sensationalizing Murder →
  • Recent Posts

    • A viable solution to mass murder
    • Law of Diminishing Returns
    • Combat Effectiveness
    • Compound Trauma
    • Quitting and Perseverance
    • Domestic Overflow
    • Defense in a crowded environment
    • Knowledge or Equipment?
    • Techniques or Technique? What’s the difference anyway?
    • Classical Conditioning and the Pavlovian Response
  • Recent Comments

    • Practice makes permanent | Strategic Defense Group on Practice makes perfect… Or does it?
    • Christina Grimmie: Stalking & Murder | Strategic Defense Group on Christina Grimmie: Case Information
    • Need to know: Fatal Funnel | Strategic Defense Group on Need to know: Critical Vulnerability
    • Need to know: Cover & Concelament | Strategic Defense Group on Need to know: Critical Vulnerability
    • Need to know: Critical Vulnerability | Strategic Defense Group on Buzzwords: Situational Awareness
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Parament by Automattic.
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: